[ausev] Austin EV startup
evehicle4me at hischopsticks.org
evehicle4me at hischopsticks.org
Sun Jun 1 01:36:35 GMT 2008
In every serious discussion of hydrogen generation I have read the
solution has always come down to using some kind of solar energy (i.e.
stationery, not moving) to generate the energy needed to create
hydrogen. This includes wind turbines, wave turbines or solar
collectors, even mirrors tracking the sun to create a solar steam
engine. Yes, there is no such thing as a free lunch, it takes money
to make money and it takes energy to make energy. These are all
given. The problem we 21st century folk have is that we want to be
mobile, and to be comfortable while moving about.
Hydrogen as a fuel is a great idea but generating it on the fly has
some challenges. The bottom line is what is the net exchange? What
do you gain? Back in the last 70's I read an article in Popular
Mechanics or Science about a group of scientists that had created a
way to store hydrogen as a compound with a loose molecular bond to
another element. When hot gas (even from the exhaust) was passed
through this system hydrogen would be released and could be used.
Thus it could be stored in a relatively safe manner, free from images
of the Hindenberg, etc
Quoting Charlesvsi at aol.com:
> one last word on hydrogen, Don't forget it must be compressed and kept sub
> zero cold to store it efficiently.
> . And if it escapes and starts to burn, that's called an explosion, Who
> wants this compressor plant in their back yard. The first explosion will kill
> many, and will kill hydrogen as a public commodity.
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 5/31/2008 5:38:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> bytedawg at bytetamer.com writes:
>
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:50 AM, m. edmund howse <_bytedawg at bytetamer.com_
> (mailto:bytedawg at bytetamer.com) > wrote:
>
> Actually it isn't off topic because hydrogen is a good source of electricity
> for the electric motor.
> I'm working on an electric motorcycle and auto at the moment myself. And.
> A lot of discussion here has been in regards to some form of generating
> power to provide electricity to charge batteries etc. ICE are of
> course a good
> potential depending on the fuel. As far as I'm concerned the cleaner the
> better. But if hydrogen on demand works and some claim it does then
> you may only
> need one battery in your electric vehicle instead of dozens and your range
> will be unlimited. Kind of scary. But if you want to use batteries,
> don't let me
> stop you. And of course if you don't want or can't believe it can be done I
> won't argue with you either. But so far from my experience it only takes 12
> watts of power to begin extracting hydrogen from plain old tap water.
> As far as I'm concerned whether hydrogen is used as a source of electricity
> to power an electric motor or as a source of energy to power an ICE that
> could do either should be of concern to all.
>
> marv
>
>
>
> Ian Ward wrote:
>
> I think you misunderstand my point, Marv. This being the Austin ELECTRIC
> Vehicles mailing list, I'm not comparing it to the efficiency of
> gasoline, I'm
> comparing it to a pure electric drive.
>
> Sure, with hydrogen drive (HCE or fool cell) you are removing the millions
> of point sources of pollution and there is something to be said for
> that, but
> when you compare the energy it takes to power a hydrogen car vs an electric
> car, you're wasting a lot of energy - the pollution of THAT is certainly an
> argument.
>
> - ian
>
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:26 AM, m. edmund howse <_bytedawg at bytetamer.com_
> (mailto:bytedawg at bytetamer.com) > wrote:
>
> Efficiency???? How much energy do you think it takes, Ian, to produce
> gasoline??? And how much pollution does this process create???
> As far as hydrogen is concerned, I have built a hydrogen generator and I
> cannot understand why
> anyone would NOT consider this a feasible source of energy to power an
> automobile.
> Hydrogen burns clean, really clean, producing only water. And if you
> integrate this concept into the efficiency quotient in the
> reduction of pollution, I
> think the efficiency concept is not even an argument.
>
> marv
>
>
> Ian Ward wrote:
>
> I am more interested in their plug-in electrics, which admittedly, don't
> seem to be the focus of their business. I was just wondering if they've
> attempted to work or consult with anyone in the vicinity.
>
> I don't believe hydrogen is a viable energy storage medium because "it's the
> efficiency, stupid." Although, when you are talking about super-performance
> cars, you get to hand-wave those kinds of rational arguments at will.
>
> - ian
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Gil Dawson <_Gil at gil.dawson.name_
> (mailto:Gil at gil.dawson.name) > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> At 4:30 P -0500 5/30/08, Ian Ward wrote:
> Has anyone met/talked with these guys? This is out of the blue to me...
>
> _http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2008/05/26/daily29.html_
> (http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2008/05/26/daily29.html)
> _http://www.ronnmotors.com/_ (http://www.ronnmotors.com/)
>
>
>
>
> I haven't, but it's an interesting idea. Hydrogen is expensive, relative to
> gasoline (or, at least it was when they first suggested fuel cell cars.)
> But you only consume it when you want to go fast.
>
>
> Would you call this a hybrid?
>
>
> If this idea sells then, if gas prices rise faster than hydrogen prices
> (quite likely, IMHO), I can imagine that eventually they could
> offer a series of
> aftermarket kits that would let the owner use more and more hydrogen and
> require less and less gas.
>
>
> Ronn's taking a post-modernist approach to the transition.
>
>
> --Gil
>
>
> P.S. The article doesn't say, but these cars will burn hydrogen in an
> internal combustion engine, right? They're not talking fuel cell
> here, are they?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusEV mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with
> Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
> (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
>
More information about the AusEV
mailing list